IBM And Sun Discuss An Open Source Java

This can’t be a new topic to you, but it continues to be one worth discussing.  While Sun doesn’t make money from its stewardship of Java (their words), it continues to want to control the platform.  Many believe that although there has been an increasing amount of community activity around Java, a Community Process (what Java has), controlled by Sun, isn’t the same thing as Open Source.  Furthermore, if Java were available in Open Source lots more people would be willing to use it.

Is that true?  No one really knows, but many of us suspect it’s true.

In any case, over a long period of time, many individuals, companies, and institutions have tried to convince Sun that there is a way for them to give Java over to an independent Open Source organization, while maintaining whatever relationship with Java that Sun wants and needs, as its originator and one of its biggest commercial supporters.

Recently, one of these efforts made a public appearance.

When IBM took Eclipse (the web services open source tools) out to their own independent organization, this handover occurred in the setting of the Eclipse.con conference.  At that conference, a Sun technical speaker, Simon Phipps (who happens to be a former IBMer) was quoted as indicating that an Open Source Java might be a future possibility and wondering why IBM didn’t offer its implementation of Java to the open source community. (You can read about that in http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1517697,00.asp).

With that in mind, IBM manager Rod Smith, VP of Emerging Technologies, issued an open letter (via the press) to Sun manager Rob Gingell, noting that IBM was a strong supporter of both Open Source and Java and would be happy to provide any necessary resources to help Sun open source Java.  Gingell has replied, agreeing that it would be a good idea as long as Sun could protect its investment in Java and its proprietary products that are built on Java.

We spoke with Dr. Bob Sutor at IBM, another strong proponent of Open Source Java, who says he’s certain that there is a way to open source Java and, at the same time, preserve Sun’s own intellectual property. 

One needs to keep in mind, of course, that while IBM and Sun cooperate about the success of Java, they are fierce competitors in the hardware and software markets. 

Sun always used to claim that it had to maintain control of Java to prevent Microsoft from destroying it.  We’d guess that Java has achieved the maturity and widespread usage that keeps this from being a continuing issue and that Sun’s reluctance now centers on whether it could maintain its value around the Java brand if Java were to go to Open Source.

I’m betting that this is possible.  The question is, what business models can we offer Sun that they would find acceptable?  Your comments are invited.   

(back to top)  

Comments or Questions: Send Email to opinions@wohl.com

Home/ Search / 2005 Articles / Issue Archive / Free Newsletter

Entire contents © 2001  by Amy D. Wohl. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden.