SCO vs. IBM And Linux:  An Update

Where shall we start?  When last we left SCO and IBM, SCO had amended its filing to focus on the notion that anything based on UNIX was a derivative work and therefore belonged to SCO.  That meant all of Sequent’s and AIX’s high end features (like NUMA and enterprise style processing) somehow now belong to SCO.  In case you’re wondering IBM doesn’t agree.

IBM plans to play the GPL card (the one that says that since SCO was a Linux distribution itself it can scarcely claim that it is owed royalties on that which it agreed to freely distribute). 

OSDL Provides Some Help

In this it is now joined by the OSDL (Open Systems Development Labs), which has recently provided an opinion by its attorney, Lawrence Rosen, an expert on open source licenses.  The opinion does not attempt to give advice, but rather to answer questions about the situation. 

It looks at the involvement in Linux by SCO and IBM, who (if anyone) controls the copyright to Linux, and provides an assessment of the impact SCO vs. IBM may have on Linux users. 

Rosen points out, by the way, that should SCO prevail against IBM, it would be extremely unlikely that SCO could then collect licensing fees from individual Linux users, since that would in a sense by collecting twice, and the law does not generally support this type of unfair reward.   (That would seem to indicate that Mr. Rosen thinks Linux users can safely ignore SCO’s demands for license fees.)

At the OSDL site, you may also read a paper by Eben Moglen, a professor at Columbia University, Questioning SCO: A Hard Look at Nebulous Claims.  (You can see where that’s going from the title.) These papers and other information about OSDL and Linux are located at www.osdl.org.

More Secret Documents

IBM may also plan to rely on a series of letters from Novell, previously unrevealed, that show that Novell retained certain rights in UNIX when it sold the operating system to SCO (the company now known as Tarantella) in 1995.  This included its right to waive any rights against IBM, which Novell chose to exercise and duly informed SCO it was exercising.  This may give IBM a very nice Ace in the hole.  (SCO quickly noted that any waiver from Novell, if it existed, wouldn’t apply to Sequent, not a part of IBM when it signed its original contract with AT&T.  That may mean it just acknowledged that Novell could waive the rights against IBM.)

The GPL Card

SCO is now claiming (from its Forum in Las Vegas) that it can’t wait to address the GPL since it is illegal and is against the copyright law. 

While this startled (and I think scared) some Open Source developers and users, Eben Mogel (see above) quickly poured water on that fire.  An article in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal, quoted SCO’s legal counsel with the claim that SCO would challenge the GPL's "legality" on the ground that the GPL permits licensees to make unlimited copies of programs it covers, while copyright law only allows a single copy to be made. SCO seems to believe the GPL is preempted by federal copyright law. 

Eben Mogel notes that this is a frivolous argument and that he believes it would be a violation of professional obligation for SCO’s attorney or any other lawyer to submit it to a court. If it were true, no copyright license could permit the licensee to make multiple copies of the licensed program, even if the copyright owner chose to grant that right.  You will find Mogel’s comments at http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/sco/sco-preemption.html .

But Life Goes On

In the meantime, SCO has continued to threaten Linux users with law suits if they don’t sign up for licenses, claiming that two unnamed Fortune 500 firms have now signed for some number of licenses.  This would sound more interesting with names and numbers, of course.  They have even hired a new VP of SCOSource to be in charge of their IP Licensing.  I think I don’t envy him.

Meanwhile, life continues.  IBM is still selling lots of AIX and Linux – as is HP, Red Hat, SuSE, and others.  Apparently, customers are certain that whatever happens, the disappearance of Linux is not at hand.

SCO Holds Its Own Annual Forum

SCO itself is holding a customer event this week, with announcements mainly focusing on both its own new products as well as the anti-Linux law suit.  There is a clear focus on bringing SCO into the modern computing environment:  web services via a partnership with Ericom and the SCOx web services initiative, a new release of the UnixWare Office Mail Server, and enhanced support for Microsoft’s Active Directory. 

SCO seems to be using the Forum to plead its case against IBM and Open Source to its own community.  Some Open Source representatives have been on hand, using the Forum to seek an audience with SCO, putting them on notice that if the Open Source community is not given an opportunity to see the infringing code and remove it, it will be because SCO chose not to provide the opportunity for this remedy.

(back to top)  

Comments or Questions: Send Email to opinions@wohl.com

Home/ Search / 2005 Articles / Issue Archive / Free Newsletter

Entire contents © 2001  by Amy D. Wohl. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden.