It's The Business Model, Not The Product

8/29/01


Several events converged this week, convincing me it was exactly the right time to consider the importance of identifying and executing the right business model.  We'd guess perhaps 50% of a company's success lies here, especially a company in a new and unproven market.  This is particularly interesting to discuss because:

(1) We're continuing to see interesting products with poorly conceived or badly executed business models exit the marketplace.  Examples are everywhere, from publications like The Industry Standard to new currencies like Flooz.com, Beenz.com, and CyberCash. 
 
(2) We're beginning to see much more attention paid to business models by survivors and new companies.  The xSP conference we attended in Boston last week, for instance, was as much about defining a good (meaning profitable and enduring) business model as it was about new technology.
(3) We received a Letter to the Editor from a reader, Darryl Carlton, an Australian entrepreneur whose crystal ball must have been receiving on broadband.  He thought he was writing me about Microsoft, but really he was addressing the business model issue.  It's the first time we've gotten a Letter to the Editor BEFORE we wrote the article.  (Nevertheless, you will find his insightful comments in the Letters to the Editor section of this issue.)

All of this shouts that successful businesses understand business models.

WHY ARE GOOD BUSINESS MODELS IMPORTANT?

A business without a business model is like a ship at sea without maps or compass.  It might accidentally come safely to shore, but it's just as likely to flounder on a rock, sink in a storm, or wander aimlessly until it runs out of supplies. 

Like ships, businesses need to know where they're going and how to get there.  That's the business model. 

A good business model takes everything important into account:  

-- The concept and what makes it unique (competitive advantage) as well as enduring (barriers to entry, patents or others intellectual property protection)
-- The market (who will buy the product and why, including market size and targeted segments).  How the company will     communicate the message to that market.  This will necessarily include an assessment of the marketplace and the  concept's place in it.  Is it an established market where the product need only be incrementally better or cheaper?  Or is it a new market where the company will need to educate sellers, influencers, and buyers before a market can be created.
-- The competition (Who are they? What do they offer? How much market power do they hold?)
-- The Go-to-Market model:  How will the company create, sell, deliver, and support the product?  Who will help?
--

The financial model:  Where does the investment money come from?  How is revenue shared with partners?  How long will it take to be profitable?  Can existing or new competitors change the ground rules?  What would the company do then?

-- Trends in related market that will support the concept or compete with it.

If you think everyone does this and I'm being cranky, join me on my analyst rounds.  Just in the last week I spoke (so far and it's only Tuesday) to five firms (two of which aren't really companies yet).  Only one of them could be said to have a proper business model and they came to it after five or six years doing something else (related) which they could see wasn't going to be very interesting (read:  profitable).  The two groups I spoke with who aren't firms yet, just ideas (but talking seriously about funding) have all the usual problems:  can't figure out who their "real" customer is; don't understand how buying decisions are made or funded in the relevant markets; think there's no competition because they believe something would have to be identical to their idea to be competitive.

And you wonder why analysts get a reputation for being negative?  It's because we hate to see good ideas wasted for lack of careful thinking, good plans, and thoughtful follow-through.

SETTING PRIORITIES

In many start-up companies (and in many more mature companies, too), we can observe a denial of priorities.  Sometimes it's based on simple ignorance of their existence; other times it seems to be more a willful insistence that what one knows and understands must be of prime importance and the other stuff -- whatever it is -- must not matter very much.  This could lead to a company with no real product and lots of beautifully executed marketing hype (we can all remember of few of those).  But in high tech companies it's much more likely to be a case of too much emphasis on technology and little or no attention paid to:

-- customer requirements and feedback ("we know what they need")
-- competitors ("we don’t have any)
-- marketing ("this product is so good it will sell itself")
-- finances ("we'll get someone to do that as soon as we make any money")

In order for a business model to work, there must be a sense of where the money is coming from, what it will be spent on, and where and when revenues and profits will be achieved.  Setting priorities means getting these in the right order and in the right relative magnitudes.  It means understanding that you can't spend money you don't have, you can't get to revenues without working capital, and revenues without profits aren't interesting for very long.  The last sentence, of course, was believed to be permanently suspended during the Internet Bubble.

 

Setting priorities means:

-- deciding what to spend money or other resources on and in what order
-- selecting a market segment and having the discipline to stay there from both a product perspective and a customer one
-- choosing a marketing mechanism and appropriate partners and sticking with them (unless it's not working)
-- adding new things to the mix (product features, products, product lines, acquisitions, market segments, partners, etc.,  only when earlier priorities have been satisfactorily accomplished or abandoned as no longer suitable   

This is hard stuff.  When things are going slowly it's very hard not to take on customers opportunistically even if they don't fit your focus and will take you away from your plans -- but you should.  It's even harder to have the discipline to control spending to the plan when you see competitors throwing money about madly and you have some in the bank -- but you'll be happy you did when you make it to the next milestone and they're falling apart.

ARE BUSINESS MODELS ONLY FOR START-UPS?

Don't think that business models are only for the beginnings of companies.  Good, well managed companies are constantly refining their business models to reflect the realities of economic cycles, changing markets and competition, and new technologies.  This allows them to understand which products and programs should be in sunset planning phases and which should be on the path upward, urged forward with the resources milked from elderly cash cows. 

High technology businesses are not kind.  They demand innovation, fast thinking, and rapid action and reaction.  We like to say that you have a choice -- eat your children, those aging products that are no longer competitive, and use them to grow the next generation -- or watch the next generation of competitors eat them for you. 

You can smell the challenges to big successful companies all around us.  Look at how much companies like IBM, Sun, HP, Compaq, and Microsoft have had to change their business models in order to survive and thrive.  Some clearly have done this better than others.  There is no rest point, no comforting plateau where companies can rest.  Just the next step up -- or down -- but if you are willing to work on the business model and live by it you get to choose.

HOMEWORK ASSIGNMENT

Do you know where your company's business model is kept?  What's in it?  Is it up to date?  Do you follow it?  If not, what are you going to do about it?  We are in the midst of an enormous change.  The old world of buying all of our own information systems hardware and software and managing it within our own companies may be drawing to a close.  The Internet has enabled new ways of providing access to information and processing and we are rushing to see how we -- vendors and users -- will take advantage of this.  Old business models will not work here.  Lots of hard thinking -- much of it out of the box and specific to individual companies and market segments will be required.  I know you're already at work.

(back to top)

==========================================

Darryl:

There is a fair amount of agreement that Microsoft has not pioneered much new technology, but rather purchased, integrated, and refined technology in the marketplace.  It is also, as you have so correctly stated, a real marketing channel powerhouse.

Analysts are fond of saying that we have lots of proof that the best technology isn't what wins.  But if superior marketing is the critical element, then we must be looking for a better marketeer or a clear break in marketing methodology (we thought that was the Internet) that favors someone else. 

Amy Wohl

==========================================

Amy:

The better mousetrap is not marketing -- it's business models

Often new technology models provide a means to an end for new business models. BizTone was not about technology - it was just a necessary step for us in order to get to Software as a Service............  applications that can simply be used rather than downloaded.

Microsoft is still trying to figure out how to download its apps, and rent them, so it is creating intrusive technology that checks every time you use their apps.

And who wants to download 645MB just to write a letter anyway. Software as a Service as a technology model, allows users to gain access to applications (without downloading) that allow them to perform business or personal productivity functions, i.e.: a service (you don’t download the switch operating system when you want to make a phone call), which becomes ipso-facto a new business model, which opens up new marketing channels, and ways of competing that cannot be dealt with by traditional vendors .............  we could have won, we should have ! - we had gutless VC's.

I am off next week to buy a dive resort in the south pacific - and retire from this crazy business ...........  to sit on the beach and drink mai tai's while the sun sets across the ocean.

bye

(back to top)

===========================================

I hope you enjoyed this issue of Amy D. Wohl's Opinions.  I urge you to forward this newsletter to your friends and associates or direct them to our website where they can sign up for their very own copy delivered directly to their Inbox every Wednesday at http://www.wohl.com/signup.htm .

If you've missed any past issues, you can find the most recent articles at http://www.wohl.com/trendstm.htm.

Sincerely, 

Amy D. Wohl
EDITOR
Amy D. Wohl's Opinions

===========================================

(back to top)

==========================================
SUBSCRIBE
===========================================
It's easy to subscribe to our newsletter.  Just follow one of these two methods:

EMAIL: Send a blank message to amywohls-opinions-subscribe@wohl.biglist.com

WWW: Visit our Website and fill out the quick form found at http://www.wohl.com/signup.htm

==========================================
UNSUBSCRIBE
===========================================
You will be able to unsubscribe for any reason, at any time, by following the instructions included at the bottom of every issue or by visiting our Website at http://www.wohl.com/signup.htm.

Sincerely,

Amy D. Wohl
EDITOR
Amy D. Wohl's Opinions

 

Comments or Questions: Send Email to opinions@wohl.com

Home/ Search / 2005 Articles / Issue Archive / Free Newsletter

Entire contents © 2001  by Amy D. Wohl. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this publication in any form without prior written permission is forbidden.